Security built to outlast quantum.
QuantSEC researches and builds multi-layered cryptographic software and hardware that protects your data and your crypto, today and after large quantum computers arrive.
What you're looking at: a two-dimensional lattice with a shifting basis. The orange line is its shortest vector. ML-KEM and ML-DSA, the new post-quantum standards, are secure because finding that vector is believed to be infeasible in hundreds of dimensions, even for a quantum computer.
Build cryptographic infrastructure that never has a last secure day
Most wallets and services rely on a single signature scheme that a large quantum computer will break. We layer independent defenses so no single failure exposes a key, and we plan every upgrade years before it's needed.
How the layers workOne security stack, from silicon to software
Cryptographic software
Five independent layers: post-quantum transport, threshold key management, hybrid signatures, encrypted storage and tamper-evident audit logs.
Learn moreHardware security
Signing devices built around certified secure elements, characterized entropy sources and active tamper response, attacked in our own lab before anyone else gets the chance.
Learn morePost-quantum research
Applied work on ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA: what they cost on-chain, how to combine them safely with today's schemes, and how to migrate existing accounts.
Learn moreTesting & verification
Continuous fuzzing, known-answer tests, machine-checked proofs and independent audits. Nothing ships on the strength of a code review alone.
Learn moreCrypto asset protection
Threshold wallets and quantum-safe vault designs for Solana, so funds stay protected even if one device, one key or one algorithm fails.
Learn moreThree principles behind every system we ship
Nested shells: transport, key management, signing, storage and audit each assume the layer outside them has already failed.
A clock-glitch attack window. Our hardware has to keep its secrets while we deliberately corrupt its power and timing.
Lattice parameters can be raised as attacks improve. Crypto-agility means a stronger setting is a software update, not a migration.
Current research
What the team is working on now. Each item becomes a public research note when it's ready for review.
Hybrid signatures for Solana
Pairing Ed25519 with ML-DSA so a transaction stays valid only if both signatures check out. We're measuring size, compute and fee impact.
Read moreThreshold key management
Splitting signing power across devices so no single phone, laptop or server ever holds a complete key.
Read moreQuantum-safe vaults
Hash-based signature vaults that let holders move funds behind protection that doesn't depend on elliptic curves.
Read moreSide-channel hardening
Testing whether power draw, timing or electromagnetic leakage can reveal keys from a signing device, then designing that leakage out.
Read moreEntropy you can audit
Characterizing hardware random number generators with continuous health tests, so weak randomness can't quietly produce guessable keys.
Read moreThe numbers we design to
These are engineering targets, not results. We'll report measured figures against each one as research notes are published.
Independent layers between an attacker and a key, each tested as if the others had failed.
Post-quantum algorithms in scope: ML-KEM (FIPS 203), ML-DSA (FIPS 204) and SLH-DSA (FIPS 205).
Minimum post-quantum security level for every primitive we deploy.
No device, server, person or algorithm whose compromise alone could move user funds. This is the rule every design review checks first.
Every algorithm we use has a documented replacement path before it ships. The roadmap runs in 1, 2, 5 and 10-year horizons.
Of our core cryptographic libraries and device firmware, published with reproducible builds so anyone can check what runs.